Tangelic Talks – Season 03 | Episode 12
Empowering a Just Energy Transition: Deborah Fadeyi on Climate Justice, Equitable Finance & Youth Leadership
14 minutes to read
In this compelling episode of Tangelic Talks, co-hosts Victoria Cornelio and Andres Tamez sit down with Deborah Fayedi — a global sustainability leader driving equitable energy transitions across Africa, Asia, and Europe. As Decarbonization Lead at Thames Water, Founder of REES Africa, and CEO of Vector Energy, Deborah is transforming how communities access clean, affordable power — and how youth are leading the charge for climate resilience. From her deeply personal story of losing a childhood friend to carbon monoxide poisoning to her groundbreaking innovations like EcoWise, Deborah shares how lived experience, local engagement, and financial inclusion can redefine climate justice from the ground up.
From Tragedy to Purpose: A Personal Mission for Energy Justice
Deborah’s passion for sustainability was shaped early. As a child in Nigeria, she witnessed flooding, energy poverty, and loss firsthand — including the tragic death of a friend from carbon monoxide poisoning caused by a generator. That experience became the foundation for her life’s work: ending energy poverty through clean innovation.
She later founded REES Africa, an initiative bringing solar energy to remote Nigerian communities that had never seen electric light. Her question was simple but powerful: “How can we move away from fossil fuels while ensuring people still have access to energy?”
Her solution — solar power for productive use — changed lives across rural Nigeria. But her vision went beyond lighting homes. Deborah wanted to create opportunities for young people, training over 2,000 youth in sustainable energy and helping them build careers in climate solutions.
Building Sustainable Change: From Grassroots Innovation to Global Policy
Deborah’s work caught the attention of governments and multilaterals, eventually leading her to influence energy policy across Africa and Europe. Today, as Decarbonization Lead at Thames Water, she helps one of the UK’s largest utilities cut emissions while advancing climate resilience strategies.
Her career embodies the bridge between grassroots activism and global systems change. What sets her apart is her insistence on co-creation — ensuring that people directly affected by energy poverty and climate change are part of the conversation.
“A rural woman who cooks with firewood isn’t just a beneficiary — she’s a key stakeholder,” Deborah explains.
Through her projects, she’s demonstrated how lived experiences can shape more effective clean-energy policies. By combining quantitative data with qualitative insights, Deborah advocates for models that reflect real community behavior — such as understanding why rural households may resist clean cooking technologies because of cultural beliefs about taste.
Why Equitable Climate Finance Matters
One of the most powerful parts of the conversation is Deborah’s breakdown of equitable climate finance — a concept often misunderstood as foreign aid. For her, it’s not charity; it’s investment in our shared future.
During the industrial revolution, the Global North built wealth through fossil fuels. Now, the Global South is being asked to industrialize sustainably — but without equal access to capital. Deborah argues this imbalance must change if we’re serious about net zero by 2050.
“Equitable climate finance isn’t aid. It’s an investment to enable the Global South to play its part in reducing global emissions.”
She points to carbon credits and environmental commodities as key mechanisms for channeling finance to developing regions. These tools, she says, can support green hydrogen, renewable power, and clean industrialization — ensuring that countries like Nigeria aren’t left behind in the energy transition.
Introducing EcoWise: Unlocking Climate Finance for Solar Developers
Deborah’s current project, EcoWise, embodies her commitment to bridging climate innovation and finance. The platform seeks to unlock climate finance for solar developers by improving data transparency, verification, and bankability.
In Nigeria alone, achieving a 10-gigawatt solar goal could be financed by carbon offsets — if data systems were robust enough to track and validate progress. EcoWise aims to close that gap by creating transparent systems that attract investors while empowering smaller developers who often struggle to access capital.
“The challenge isn’t access to technology,” Deborah explains. “It’s access to finance.”
Recognized internationally, EcoWise was shortlisted for the F-SHOP Prize and won the S4O Innovator Award in Bavaria earlier this year — proof that innovation rooted in community impact can achieve global recognition.
Modeling the Future: Energy Transitions and Climate Data Integrity
Deborah emphasizes that effective energy transition models must go beyond technology. They need to include financial modeling, policy incentives, and behavioral data. True sustainability, she says, requires mapping how money flows through the system — from global carbon markets to local energy access.
She also challenges policymakers to include the cost of inaction in their models. “The best time to decarbonize was yesterday,” she says, highlighting how delays in funding or regulation can drastically increase long-term costs.
This holistic modeling approach, integrating emission reductions, carbon pricing, and financial instruments, is vital to achieving global net zero targets.
Climate Anxiety, Activism, and the Power of Purpose
Beyond the data, Deborah speaks candidly about climate anxiety — a growing emotional burden for sustainability professionals. At one point, she struggled with the weight of global inaction. Her solution was to turn anxiety into action: teaching, innovating, and writing.
She’s authored children’s books on climate change, now part of Nigeria’s national curriculum, helping the next generation understand sustainability from an early age.
“If I had known more about climate change as a child,” she reflects, “my journey might have been faster. That’s why I teach children — so they can grow up ready to lead.”
This focus on intergenerational learning runs throughout Deborah’s work. She champions dialogue between senior policymakers and young climate leaders to ensure knowledge transfer and mutual understanding.
The Role of Policy and Global Cooperation
In discussing climate policy, Deborah stresses the need for transparency and accountability in global finance systems. She supports building traceable mechanisms — including carbon registries and data-driven reporting — to ensure climate finance reaches communities that need it most.
Her critique of superficial measures like large-scale “tree-planting credits” reflects a call for integrity in carbon markets. “We can’t plant our way out of climate change,” she says, arguing for more diverse clean-development methodologies like green hydrogen, sustainable steel, and renewable cement.
She also highlights South-South collaboration — partnerships among developing nations that combine indigenous knowledge and climate innovation suited to local contexts.
“A solar project that works in the UK might not work in Ghana,” she notes. “The Global South has unique solutions that deserve to be scaled.”
Hope, Urgency, and the Road to COP30
As COP30 approaches in Belém, Brazil, Deborah feels a renewed sense of urgency and hope. She believes the world is asking the right questions: Do we need new approaches to achieve SDG7? How can we make climate finance truly equitable?
She sees optimism in the growing number of young professionals — like herself — entering spaces once reserved for senior policymakers.
“When I see people my age leading climate discussions, I know the future is in capable hands,” she says.
Her message is clear: climate justice isn’t about division — it’s about collaboration. Net zero will only be achieved when all nations, north and south, move together with shared purpose.
Thought Provoking Q&A Session with Deborah Fadeyi
I’ll share a bit of background. I obviously wasn’t around during the Industrial Revolution — it feels like it was just yesterday! But while it was happening, there wasn’t any conscious effort to reduce carbon emissions. People were simply taking advantage of a new resource they had discovered — coal.
That resource essentially became the backbone of the Global North. Industrialization happened on the back of coal.
Now, the Global South is trying to reach a similar point — to industrialize and grow their economies — but they’re being asked to do so with solar and other renewable resources. The challenge, however, is that there’s no capital expenditure for that transition. So, where will the money come from?
The Global North has promised substantial financing — through mechanisms like loss and damage — to help the Global South not only industrialize sustainably, but also build climate resilience. Because the impacts of the climate crisis are already being felt: flooding, drought, migration, and even conflict.
But that money hasn’t really arrived. And here’s the key point — it shouldn’t be seen as aid or charity. It’s actually an investment that enables the Global South to play its part in global decarbonization.
Because if the Global South ends up industrializing with fossil fuels, it won’t matter if the Global North reaches net zero — global temperatures will still rise. The only way forward is shared responsibility and equitable financing.
I’d say one of the key mechanisms for enabling equitable climate finance is through environmental commodities like carbon credits.
Carbon credits — particularly under mechanisms like the Clean Development Mechanism — allow investment in a wide range of low-carbon technologies, not just renewables. This can include green steel, green hydrogen, or even green cement.
For example, in the hydrogen space — I used to work in the aerospace industry — one of the big challenges is producing enough hydrogen to decarbonize aviation. If we have hydrogen aircraft now, the question becomes: where do we get green hydrogen, and how do we make it affordable?
There are huge opportunities if we invest in the Global South, enabling sustainable industrialization through carbon credit systems. These credits could support projects like large solar plants for productive use or hybrid renewable systems for green hydrogen production — which could then be exported to the Global North.
That creates new trade pathways and shared value while taking a holistic approach to keeping global temperatures down.
From where I stand, that’s what equitable climate finance should look like. It’s not about seeing finance for the Global South as charity, but as an investment — one that strengthens communities and benefits everyone in the long run.
And of course, there’s also the question of loss and damage. Many of these countries are rightfully asking for compensation because they didn’t cause this climate crisis, yet they’re the ones facing its harshest impacts. The UNFCCC and Paris Agreement account for this — but we still haven’t seen the needle move enough for these countries.
One of the main conversations that came out of COP29 was around traceability — how do we track where climate finance actually goes and ensure it’s used appropriately?
If we understand the problem clearly, we’re already halfway to solving it. We just need to work backward from there. And importantly, we don’t have to do it alone. The countries and communities calling for equitable climate finance are ready to participate — they just need the right systems and stakeholders in place.
Yes, corruption can be an issue in some countries, but that’s why transparency is key. We need mechanisms where everyone can see what’s happening. Data should be treated as an asset — finance flows should be traceable, measurable, and tied to clear performance indicators.
If someone misuses climate funds, there must be consequences. Building transparent tracking systems would make sure the money reaches the people who actually need it — those on the frontlines of climate disasters. That’s why COP29 discussions emphasized transparent registries and digital platforms to track climate finance, much like carbon credit registries that record, verify, and retire credits.
Another related issue is carbon offsets. Tree planting, for instance, is a common offset method under the REDD+ program — but it’s not what’s going to move the needle. You can buy a tree for less than ten pence, but that doesn’t solve systemic challenges.
Many countries in the Global South need space for housing, infrastructure, and industrial development — not endless forests planted to offset emissions for companies elsewhere. Instead of focusing on cheap overseas credits, nations like the UK should look inward: reforesting their own land, restoring peatlands, and investing in biodiversity locally.
Tree planting has a role, but it must be measured carefully and done where it makes ecological sense. More importantly, there are over 300 methodologies under the Clean Development Mechanism — far beyond just tree planting. We should be exploring these.
And finally, carbon prices need to increase. Yes, that could impact consumers, but governments can design policies so that the burden doesn’t fall on households — for example, by subsidizing low-carbon materials or products.
Global South–South collaborations are absolutely critical — especially when we talk about indigenous and localized climate solutions. A solution developed in the UK might not work the same way in Ghana or Thailand, because conditions like weather, energy demand, and infrastructure are completely different.
For example, installing the same capacity of solar in the UK versus Northern Nigeria will yield vastly different outputs. That’s why regional collaboration — like what the African Union is trying to foster — is so important. They’re working toward recognizing climate refugees and supporting cross-border collaboration to develop climate solutions tailored to their contexts.
But the challenge always comes back to finance. Where does the capital expenditure (CAPEX) come from? Many of these countries need concessional financing — low-interest, long-term funding — to build climate infrastructure and industrial systems that can serve both local and global markets.
A strong South–South network could, for instance, produce affordable green hydrogen across Africa and Asia, which can then be exported to the Global North. This would lower the overall cost of hydrogen and help industries like aviation decarbonize without drastically increasing costs.
So, South–South collaboration isn’t just about mutual support — it’s about creating value that benefits the entire planet, while recognizing and maximizing indigenous innovation.
Global collaboration must go beyond aid and focus on investment and trade in climate products. Policymakers should be thinking about expanding trade frameworks to include climate resilience — to actively encourage the exchange of low-carbon materials, green technologies, and sustainable goods.
For example, the EU and UK’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAMs) will soon impose taxes on high-carbon imports such as steel, fertilizer, cement, and hydrogen. If these goods are produced with clean technologies, they could be more competitive internationally.
This creates an opportunity for the Global South to export low-carbon products — but only if they receive upfront investment to develop green industries. That’s why climate finance from the Global North shouldn’t be viewed as charity or aid, but as strategic investment that benefits everyone.
Many countries in the Global South simply don’t have the budgetary space to fund these transitions alone. The goal should be to channel funding in ways that build local capacity, generate jobs, and ensure long-term shared prosperity — rather than one-off financial transfers.
Deborah Fadeyi
Energy and Sustainability Executive