Tangelic Talks – Season 02 | Episode 07
Decolonizing Climate Messaging: A Deep Dive on Greenwashing & Power w/ Stefano Cisternino | S02E07
9 minutes to read
In this thought-provoking episode, we sit down with Stefano, a communications expert on the circular economy and climate policy, to unpack the powerful role that storytelling plays in shaping our understanding of the climate crisis. Together, we explore how communication can both illuminate and obscure critical issues like the European Green Deal and circular economy, depending on whose voices are centered—and whose are left out.
Stefano shares insights from his experience working across European institutions and journalism, emphasizing the urgent need to decolonise climate discourse. We discuss how to meaningfully include Indigenous, frontline, and Global South perspectives in spaces traditionally dominated by Western narratives, and why reframing climate education within European institutions is vital. That includes confronting histories of colonialism, resource extraction, and structural inequality, while uplifting diverse and local forms of environmental knowledge.
Greenwashing: Systemic, Subtle, and Strategic
Greenwashing, often misunderstood as mere corporate misrepresentation, is more complex and systemic than we think. Stefano explains that it’s not always malicious but emerges from institutional pressure, political influence, and the push for impact optics over real change.
“We’re shifting from ambition to appearance,” Stefano says. He illustrates how policy teams are pressured into pushing positive climate messaging without transparent, verifiable action plans. The result? A top-down cascade of misinformation that erodes public trust and disengages communities—particularly youth—from institutions and climate discourse.
Misinformation, Power, and Whose Knowledge Counts
Stefano makes a bold assertion: “All knowledge is not neutral.” In climate communication, Western epistemology is often seen as authoritative, while Indigenous knowledge is dismissed as anecdotal or emotional.
This bias silences the lived experiences of rural and Indigenous communities, especially in the Global South. “They are portrayed as victims, not as agents of change,” he says. Even well-meaning international summits like COP often lack meaningful representation from the very people they claim to serve. The result is a climate narrative that reinforces historical imbalances and perpetuates epistemic injustice.
From Communication to Conversation: Listening as a Tool for Change
Stefano urges communicators to practice active listening. “Communication is a two-way process. Most of us, even while listening, are thinking about what we want to say next,” he explains. He shares a powerful story from his time in Colombia, where he was initially excluded from Indigenous gatherings because he approached the space as a researcher, not a collaborator.
After months of silent observation, he earned trust and learned how truly transformative climate communication must begin with humility. “We need to sit at the kids’ table,” he jokes—emphasizing that true inclusion requires de-centering dominant voices and giving space to local realities.
Breaking the Top-Down Trap: Local First, Global Later
Instead of building universal messages from international institutions, Stefano argues for a bottom-up communication model rooted in local context. He stresses that sustainability campaigns cannot be one-size-fits-all.
“You can’t transplant a solution developed in Brussels into Ghana or Colombia and expect it to work,” he says. Even within Europe, the EU Green Deal is poorly understood at the local level. Bridging this gap requires tailored storytelling, cross-cultural co-creation, and partnering with local media, researchers, and community leaders.
Visual Storytelling and Street-Level Journalism
Stefano proposes ditching rigid policy PDFs in favor of accessible formats like oral history, visual storytelling, and street interviews. He shares a sobering anecdote about writing an article on Indigenous music therapy that looked “polished” but felt empty because it lacked community input and context.
He calls for a broader communication toolkit—not just for journalists and NGOs but also policymakers, funders, and climate educators.
From Tokenism to Transformation
At a UN conference in New York, Stefano witnessed yet another panel about Indigenous resilience—with no Indigenous speakers. He recalls one attendee finally standing up and saying: “We don’t want your help anymore. We’re going to do it ourselves.”
This moment of rupture underscores his key message: stop talking about marginalized communities and start talking with them.
Lessons from the Global South
Stefano emphasizes the wealth of circular practices already embedded in traditional societies. In Ghana, for instance, Indigenous forest management systems exist but are absent from national policy documents. In Italy, he remembers agricultural traditions that once blended music, ritual, and planting cycles—now dismissed as unscientific.
“We’re sitting on a pile of wheels, trying to reinvent one,” he says, criticizing Western technocratic arrogance. Indigenous and rural communities have already innovated many climate solutions. We just haven’t been listening.
Three Ways to Decolonize Climate Messaging:
Platform Indigenous and Local Knowledge
Partner with local researchers and media as collaborators, not just sources. Challenge Western-centric algorithms and funding priorities.Train Communicators to Spot Epistemic Bias
Go beyond fact-checking. Ask: Who is quoted? Whose knowledge is amplified? Who is missing from the narrative?Broaden the Communication Toolkit
Embrace visual, oral, and experiential storytelling methods. Prioritize accessibility and cultural context over institutional language.
Thought Provoking Q&A Session with Stefano Cisterino
The short answer is in the name: the European Green Deal. That name alone is supposed to represent the EU's broad climate ambitions—but honestly, that can feel a bit shallow unless we dig in more technically.
The Green Deal is a comprehensive roadmap. If you look at it purely from a theoretical standpoint, it could, in theory, be applied anywhere. It provides specific direction, guidelines, and suggestions around climate neutrality, biodiversity, sustainable food systems, and more. But unless you work in Brussels, it probably just sounds like another buzzword.
That’s because the way we communicate it assumes a kind of insider familiarity with policymaking processes. After four years working in Brussels, I knew all the acronyms, all the policy instruments. But the moment I stepped outside that bubble, I had to try and explain it to other people—my parents, for instance—and they’d just look at me confused, saying, “What even is the European Green Deal?”
We forget that the public doesn’t live in our professional world. They live in real places—our towns and communities—and are facing very real struggles. So if people don’t know what the Green Deal is, that’s a failure of communication.
To be fair, I have seen some improvement from EU institutions. They’ve tried to develop a more general communication strategy that can also be tailored to specific countries. That’s a step in the right direction. But once you step outside the EU altogether, it becomes a completely different challenge.
I took part in the Climate Reality Leadership training with Al Gore, and he was trying to compare the Inflation Reduction Act in the US to the European Green Deal. But even he struggled—because while they may aim for similar outcomes, they function in totally different systems. So what’s the missing piece? In my opinion: storytelling.
Storytelling can be a bridge. But like any bridge, if it’s built on shaky foundations, it can collapse. When we talk about the Green Deal, we can’t just present it as this abstract institutional framework. We have to make it feel real—by the people, for the people—and show how everyday people can actually get involved and improve it.
One great initiative in that spirit is Green Deal Going Local. It’s a framework created to make the Green Deal more practical and place-based. One of my first job experiences was helping my region implement it, and it was eye-opening. Even at the local and national level, many public administrators had never heard of the Green Deal.
Later, I started working with organizations in Cameroon, especially around circular economy in the textile sector. I’d try to share tools and ideas from the EU context, and they’d tell me, “We’ve never heard of any of this.” It was a stark reminder: the way we communicate in Europe doesn’t necessarily translate elsewhere.
And this brings us back to a deeper point: when it comes to sustainability and the climate crisis, the entire conversation is still heavily shaped by Western influence. Information is power. And when knowledge is centralized in certain parts of the world, it creates imbalance.
If we want the Green Deal to have real global impact, we first have to recognize that even many Europeans don’t fully understand it. So how can we expect others, in completely different contexts, to engage with it meaningfully? We need to rethink not just what we’re communicating—but how, to whom, and why.
Do you know the concept of peace enforcement?
So this was something originally created by the first peace-building missions of the United States in different countries, particularly in the Middle East. When the situation was too difficult for traditional peace-building, it became what was called peace enforcement—the imposition of peace in order to create the conditions where peace-building could eventually happen.
After the first experiments—though calling them "experiments" here tragically means the loss of many human lives—peace enforcement began to be recognized as a violation of human rights.
If we take that idea—the enforcement of something—and connect it to decolonization, it becomes clear: when we try to implement a purely Western concept in a non-Western country, in a place with a different system and context, it's an imposition. It doesn’t work. It’s like transplanting an organ into a body that will reject it—it simply doesn’t belong.
So we come back to everything we’ve been discussing: active listening, proper training, and ultimately recognizing that not every solution works in every context. We need to be critically aware of how we create narratives and implement solutions—especially in areas like sustainability and the climate crisis.
I hope that answers your question. I can go deeper into the technical aspects, but I thought this analogy was helpful for now.
Let’s take the example of Ghana. There are so many traditional, community-based initiatives—like resource management systems and indigenous forecasting methods. But when I looked through Ghana’s climate policies, I found it really interesting—and honestly, quite troubling—that there wasn’t a single mention of these kinds of technologies or solutions developed by indigenous communities.
These methods do exist, and they are effective. But the way they’re framed—how they're narrated—doesn’t align with what national institutions want to present to the broader public. They’re often dismissed as anecdotal or emotional, which is a huge misconception. That kind of dismissal usually comes from a lack of understanding—or worse, a refusal to acknowledge the value of that knowledge.
And this isn’t unique to Ghana. It’s widespread—even in my own country. For context, I moved from Spain to Italy as a child, and I was fascinated by traditional agricultural practices. Some of them involved music or dancing as part of the land management process. But in school, those traditions were dismissed. They were treated as myths or even witchcraft.
As a child, it was confusing. What should I believe? What’s effective? Who’s credible? It created this internal clash about trust and knowledge—and I know I’m not the only one who went through that. It’s a process many people face their whole lives.
At some point, we realize that we’re not reinventing the wheel. That knowledge already exists—it's just not being acknowledged or valued. And this knowledge isn’t just relevant for the climate crisis—it also speaks to wider human dynamics. Right now, there’s a deep disconnect between rural and indigenous communities and the rest of society.
Unless we address that disconnect, all the other work—redefining narratives, training journalists, addressing epistemic biases—doesn’t matter. It’s meaningless if we don’t confront the root problem: that the solutions are already there, and we’re ignoring them.
Those solutions won’t come from policymakers in ivory towers. They’ll come from the farmer who has experienced climate change firsthand over the past decade—whose income has steadily declined while taxes on his land have steadily risen. Take, for example, the Dutch farmers during the nitrogen crisis in 2023. That’s just one case, but it illustrates the point clearly.
Yes, here are some that I have used before to understand things more and prepare for these types of conversations:
Decolonising climate narratives
Tyndall Centre article exploring how climate communication remains centred in the Global North and suggests ways to shift narrative power:
https://tyndall.ac.uk/news/decolonising-climate-communication-narratives/ tandfonline.com+15tyndall.ac.uk+15spectrum.library.concordia.ca+15
Colonial responsibility and narrative debt
Bhathal, Concordia University (2023): a report framing the excess emissions of the Global North as a moral and narrative debt:
https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/992794/ spectrum.library.concordia.caspectrum.library.concordia.ca+1spectrum.library.concordia.ca+1
Indigenous knowledge in Ghanaian resilience
Study from UGSpace (2021) showing how farmers use traditional signs—like frog calls or cloud patterns—to guide adaptation strategies:
https://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/items/8849f6f9-06f5-41a3-a37c-5ec1e3993598 researchgate.net+15ugspace.ug.edu.gh+15ugspace.ug.edu.gh+15
Decolonising climate education
Mbah & Ezegwu, Sustainability (2024): systematic review showing persistent exclusion of Indigenous knowledge in African curricula and strategies for change:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093744 link.springer.com+8mdpi.com+8research.manchester.ac.uk+8
Why narratives matter
Corner & Clarke, “Talking Climate” (2017): this work argues that narrative, not data, drives engagement—key evidence for our segment:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-46744-3 researchgate.net+14researchgate.net+14tandfonline.com+14link.springer.com
Stefano Cisterino
Communications Expert on Circular Economy

Stefano Cisterino is a communications expert on the circular economy at ICLEI Europe, where they specialize in making policy and technical topics clear, accessible, and engaging.
Previously, they worked at the European Commission—across DG ENV, DG AGRI, and the Joint Research Centre—where they led media relations and crisis communication during the nitrogen protests, developed the Rural Pact’s online platform, and created public-facing materials on the EU Green Deal.
Beyond their institutional work, they write as an environmental journalist for European media, lead climate education sessions for EU trainees through The Earth Society, direct the Italian Observatory on Climate Misinformation, and coordinate the 2025 energy report for YES-Europe. Their work bridges science, policy, and people—with clarity, honesty, and purpose.