Tangelic Talks – Season 03 | Episode 14
Forests, Communities, and Climate Resilience: Inside Ghana’s Land Restoration Movement w/ Kwame Sekyere
14 minutes to read
In this inspiring episode of Tangelic Talks, we speak with Rolf Bachman, a global strategist and advocate for sustainable development, about the pivotal role of communities in addressing the climate crisis. With his extensive experience in international stakeholder engagement and social impact initiatives, Rolf shares how grassroots movements and community-driven solutions are at the forefront of climate action.
Understanding Ghana’s Forest Crisis: What’s Driving Degradation?
Ghana’s forest landscapes have been under growing pressure for decades, and Kwame doesn’t shy away from identifying the drivers. While global audiences often imagine deforestation as a single event — a forest cleared for farmland, a tree cut down for timber — the reality is layered, historical, and deeply tied to development.
According to Kwame, the major causes include:
1. Agricultural Expansion
Farming is the backbone of rural Ghanaian communities. As populations grow and farmers seek more land for cocoa, cashew, and food crops, forests increasingly become targets for expansion. “People need to eat,” Kwame emphasizes — and without climate-smart agriculture, forests become the easiest land to convert.
2. Illegal Mining (Galamsey)
The surge in unregulated mining has destroyed vast forest reserves, polluted water bodies, and left behind degraded landscapes that take decades to recover.
3. Illegal Logging
Logging without permits or oversight has accelerated biodiversity loss and destabilized entire forest ecosystems.
4. Insecure Land Tenure
Farmers often do not own the trees on their land, creating little incentive to protect or replant them. “If you don’t benefit from the tree you plant,” Kwame explains, “why would you protect it?”
These combined pressures have created a cycle where both forests and livelihoods are under threat. Yet, as Kwame points out, the story doesn’t end here — because communities are also central to the solutions.
Why Community Engagement Is the Foundation of Restoration
If there is one message Kwame returns to repeatedly, it is this: restoration must start with people, not trees.
At Tropenbos Ghana, every project begins with community entry, a culturally rooted process of meeting elders, chiefs, women leaders, youth groups, cooperatives, and local authorities. Through open forums, communities voice their needs, from water access to alternative livelihoods, before a single seedling is planted.
This engagement ensures:
- Villagers choose the species planted (e.g., mahogany, Terminalia ivorensis, or economic species they value)
- Farmers co-design the restoration model
- Projects address real needs — such as boreholes, beekeeping support, or mushroom farming
- Local governance structures are built, especially through Community Resource Management Committees (CRMCs)
These committees — made up of farmers, youth, women, chiefs, and elected members — ensure restoration is locally owned, not externally imposed. They monitor activities, distribute resources, support training, and act as community ambassadors for conservation.
“When people see the value in their forest,” Kwame says, “they will protect it.”
Climate-Smart Practices: A Pathway to Resilience
What exactly does “climate-smart” mean in practical terms?
Kwame breaks it down into three pillars:
1. Increase Productivity and Income
Communities must be able to produce more food — and more income — on smaller plots of land. This reduces the pressure to expand farmland into forests.
2. Help Farmers Adapt to Climate Change
Training helps communities cope with unpredictable rainfall, extreme heat, and shifting growing seasons.
3. Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Restoration, improved farming practices, and forest protection help keep carbon out of the atmosphere while regenerating soils and biodiversity.
These pillars turn climate action into livelihood action — especially in rural communities where climate risks manifest as hunger, crop failure, or water scarcity.
Forest Restoration as a Climate and Biodiversity Solution
For Kwame, forest restoration is a holistic system, not a single intervention. Reforestation involves:
- Growing native species
- Protecting natural regeneration
- Restoring soil fertility
- Reviving biodiversity
- Supporting livelihoods
Forests act as carbon sinks, protect water bodies, stabilize rainfall, support medicinal plants, and create economic opportunities through agroforestry and non-timber forest products.
“Once we protect the trees,” Kwame reminds us, “we protect our own lives.”
The Role of Livelihoods: Why Restoration Must Benefit People
One of the most impactful elements of this conversation is how Tropenbos integrates livelihood support into restoration.
Communities often request:
- Beekeeping
- Snail farming
- Mushroom cultivation
- Agroforestry crops
These generate income within months — crucial for farmers who cannot wait years for timber revenue.
“If the tree takes years to grow,” Kwame explains, “there must be something the farmer can eat today.”
This dual-benefit approach ensures farmers remain committed to protecting restored forests.
Technology, Mapping, and the Rise of Climate Finance
Kwame highlights an emerging source of hope: technology and climate finance.
Tools like Global Forest Watch allow communities and governments to:
- Track deforestation over time
- Monitor degraded areas
- Plan restoration with better data
Meanwhile, global climate finance — including AFR100, the World Bank, FAO, and the EU — is increasingly directing funds to forest restoration.
The key? Accountability and documentation.
“If a land has been degraded for the past 10 years,” Kwame explains, “you can get financing — but only if you document it well.”
This shift is driving renewed interest in restoration, as communities and governments recognize it offers both environmental and economic benefits.
Inside COP: The Global Politics of Forests and Climate Action
As someone who has attended COP Egypt, COP UAE, and COP Azerbaijan, Kwame offers a candid look at what actually happens inside these global climate negotiations.
He describes COP as a slow but necessary process where:
- Nations negotiate responsibilities
- The global north is pressured to fund restoration
- Developing countries advocate for fair climate financing
- Communities highlight lived experiences of climate impacts
Kwame is clear:
Progress is slow because powerful industries still benefit from fossil fuels.
But he also believes momentum is shifting.
“Gradually, they know they must move to green energy. They are making plans, and transition will come.”
His optimism is grounded not in politics, but in community power.
Lessons for Land Use: Adaptation, Learning, and Tradition
Kwame emphasizes that land-use practices must evolve:
- People must be open to new knowledge
- Farmers must be supported with research and training
- Communities must adapt as climate impacts intensify
- Traditional knowledge must be integrated, not erased
At the same time, he acknowledges that change often comes only after people experience consequences firsthand. Education, pilot projects, and community demonstration plots remain essential tools.
“People learn through practice,” he says. “When they see results, they adapt.”
Why Kwame Still Has Hope
Despite the challenges — funding gaps, illegal mining, land pressure, and slow climate negotiations — Kwame is optimistic.
He believes progress is possible because:
- Technology is improving transparency
- Climate finance is reaching more communities
- Young people are increasingly involved
- Traditional leaders are partnering with NGOs
- Communities themselves want change
- Restoration is becoming economically valuable
“Once the top leaders embrace green energy,” he says, “the future will shift for everyone.”
Final Thoughts: Forests Are Climate, Community, and Future
This conversation with Kwame Sekyere is a reminder that forest restoration is not about trees alone. It is about people — their livelihoods, their histories, their knowledge, and their future.
In Ghana and across the Global South, communities are not passive victims of climate impacts. They are leaders, innovators, stewards, and problem-solvers with generations of expertise navigating their landscapes.
Restoration succeeds when communities lead it.
Forests thrive when people thrive.
And climate justice becomes real when local voices shape global priorities.
Thought Provoking Q&A Session with Kwame Sekyere
We use what we call Community Resource Management Committees (CRMCs) in our project implementation approach. During every project, we engage these committees to build their capacity and work through them rather than imposing plans from outside.
If, for example, we want to introduce alternative livelihood options for farmers, we first meet with the CRMC members, discuss the approach, and then they identify and engage the appropriate farmers. This structure has proven very effective in helping us reach people and deliver support at scale.
Some interventions—like setting up nurseries—require us to engage communities more directly. In those cases, we may work with community associations to gather members who can help build the nursery and raise seedlings. This creates a win-win: the community benefits from the work opportunity, and the project achieves its targets. Once the seedlings are planted, we monitor progress closely, which strengthens our credibility and helps us secure additional funding for future projects.
To form the Community Resource Management Committees, we start by ensuring inclusivity. In every community, we identify leaders from various groups—such as cooperatives, youth groups, traditional authorities (like chiefs or elders), and unit committees.
We bring all these representatives together in a forum where each group nominates a member. The community then votes to select the final committee members. Typically, this results in a group of seven to eight people representing different sectors of the community.
By designing the process this way, we ensure the committee reflects the community’s diversity and has legitimacy. This makes collaboration smoother and helps us effectively reach the broader population.
It’s very competitive — especially with the EU. If they issue a call for proposals in Ghana, every NGO and every eligible organisation will apply. The same is true with the World Bank Group. So it becomes essential to keep building your skills and designing high-quality, top-notch projects that stand out during review.
The competition has also intensified because of geopolitics. Funding has been reduced, while the number of organisations seeking that funding has increased. We’re all chasing the same, now-limited resources. That’s why we have to continually adapt and develop strong, innovative proposals that remain attractive in such a crowded field.
It feels like there’s a really holistic approach we could be taking. In Ghana, for example, I’ve seen collaborations that are actually working. There are hotspot intervention areas with leaders who oversee activities in those regions. The government—particularly the Forestry Commission—works closely with these local bodies to implement emission-reduction projects.
This approach works because they meet regularly and engage side by side. The government has realized it can’t do everything alone. Government staff in a district might be limited, but the communities live in these environments every day. If you engage them consistently, they can alert you quickly when something goes wrong, and you can put the right measures in place.
When you widen the gap between government and communities, problems arise. But now in Ghana, a lot of effort is going into bridging that gap. Government officials are collaborating more directly with communities, and they’re jointly developing solutions.
Traditional knowledge has also become very important. Combining scientific knowledge with traditional knowledge is proving effective, and these integrated approaches are helping projects succeed.
Usually, when you’re introducing a restoration activity or asking communities to take part in restoration, you use certain practices as incentives—for example, “plant this tree here, and we will also support you with an alternative livelihood.” That can be part of a project design.
Others may take a different approach, such as providing climate-smart practices or improved seedlings to farmers, and then adding an alternative livelihood component. It all depends on how the project is structured. But ideally, these incentives are meant to support farmers who are already engaged in cocoa, cashew, cereal, or other types of farming. The alternative livelihood is meant to give them an additional source of income while they wait for their main crops to mature.
Beekeeping is an example—within a year, once the hive is active, farmers can harvest honey and sell it for extra income. We also encourage mushroom cultivation and snail farming. It depends on the farmer’s interests and the local context.
The most critical part is engaging farmers thoroughly. They need to understand and genuinely like what they are getting into. For instance, some may request piggery, but later they realize they can’t afford to feed the animals long-term, which leads to losses. So you need to engage deeply, understand the true costs, and make sure the livelihood option is sustainable—not just attractive on paper.
When it comes to land use, I would advocate for a gradual approach and for being adaptable to change. As we progress, new challenges and opportunities will arise, and it’s important to learn from them rather than relying solely on traditional practices passed down by previous generations. Studies and research continuously provide new knowledge, so we need to remain open to adopting new techniques and technologies.
Our focus should be on maximizing yield within smaller areas rather than simply expanding land use. This requires research, technology, and even artificial intelligence to help optimize production. At the same time, we must remain vigilant—sometimes practices we think are beneficial can later be found to harm the land or disrupt local fauna and flora. The key question is: how quickly can we adapt when we discover that something is actually damaging?
People often learn through mistakes, and while some are able to quickly adapt after lessons are shared, the majority may take longer. Building systems that allow for continuous learning and adaptation is essential for sustainable land management.
Technology is getting closer and more accessible, and people are learning. Initially, it was difficult to access global maps, but now platforms like Global Forest Watch allow us to assess areas over the past 10 or 20 years. With this knowledge, people can see that continued deforestation or environmental harm has long-term consequences, depriving future generations of benefits.
Climate finance has also created new incentives. In Ghana, for example, degraded forest reserves are now being targeted for restoration because people can access funding if they document their efforts properly. This has sparked enthusiasm among local communities to restore degraded areas.
I believe that with these opportunities and avenues, people are increasingly passionate about restoring land and forests. It’s a gradual process, but progress is being made. At the same time, top decision-makers need to understand and adopt green energy and other sustainable practices, because they control the resources and influence large-scale change. Once they adapt, we can expect broader, faster progress.
Kwame Frimpong Sekyere
Project Manager, Tropenbos Ghana
Kwame Frimpong Sekyere holds an MSc in Environmental Science and a BSc in Natural Resource Management. He is a committed environmental professional currently leading the Forest Restoration for Biodiversity and Livelihoods project in the Asante Akim South Municipal District, Ghana, supported by Terrafund for AFR100. This initiative restores degraded forestlands and empowers local communities, particularly women and youth, by combining ecological restoration with sustainable livelihoods. Kwame has previously contributed to the ASASE project, co-funded by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO), and the EU-funded LEAN project, both focused on promoting sustainable agriculture and forest management. A graduate of the Land Accelerator Africa training for landscape restoration, he applies innovative, community-driven approaches to his work. Kwame has also attended UN Climate Conferences (COP27 in Egypt, COP28 in the UAE, and COP29 in Azerbaijan), contributing to global discussions on forest restoration, climate-smart land use, and carbon markets.